_edi.png)
Occupational safety has long been dominated by conventional health and safety management practices, which focus on compliance, control, and minimising human error. However, a growing body of research and practical experience suggests that a new approach, known as "Safety Differently," may offer significant advantages in improving workplace safety and organisational resilience. This blog explores the differences between these two approaches, backed by recent academic references, to highlight the potential benefits of adopting Safety Differently.
Conventional Health and Safety Management
Key Characteristics
**Compliance-Centric:** Traditional health and safety management systems are heavily based on compliance with regulations and standards. Organisations focus on ensuring that their practices meet legal requirements to avoid penalties and litigation (Borys, 2014).
**Control and Enforcement:** These systems rely on control mechanisms, such as rules, procedures, and monitoring, to manage safety. The assumption is that workers need to be controlled to prevent unsafe behaviour (Dekker, 2019).
**Human Error Focus:** Conventional approaches often emphasise human error as a primary cause of accidents. This leads to efforts aimed at reducing mistakes through training, supervision, and disciplinary actions (Hollnagel, 2014).
Limitations
While conventional health and safety management has contributed to significant improvements in workplace safety over the past century, it has several limitations:
**Reactive Nature:** It tends to be reactive, focusing on incidents after they occur rather than proactively addressing underlying issues.
**Blame Culture:** By emphasising human error, it can create a blame culture, which may discourage reporting and transparency.
**Limited Engagement:** Workers may feel alienated by top-down control measures, leading to reduced engagement and ownership of safety practices.
Safety Differently
Key Characteristics
**Positive Engagement:** Safety Differently emphasises the positive contributions of workers. It views employees not as potential sources of error but as valuable contributors to safety (Dekker, 2014).
**Complexity and Adaptability:** This approach acknowledges the complexity of modern work environments and the need for adaptability. It encourages organisations to learn from everyday work practices and adapt safety measures accordingly (Hollnagel, 2014).
**Proactive and Resilient:** Safety Differently focuses on building resilience by proactively identifying and addressing potential safety issues. It aims to create systems that can adapt and respond effectively to unforeseen challenges (Woods, 2015).
Benefits
**Enhanced Learning:** By valuing worker input and experiences, organisations can gain deeper insights into potential safety issues and learn from near-misses and everyday operations.
**Improved Morale:** Positive engagement fosters a culture of trust and collaboration, improving worker morale and commitment to safety.
**Greater Resilience:** A focus on adaptability and resilience helps organisations better prepare for and respond to unexpected events, reducing the impact of incidents.
Recent Academic Insights
Engaging Workers
Research by Dekker (2019) highlights the importance of engaging workers in safety processes. By involving employees in safety discussions and decision-making, organisations can leverage their frontline experience to identify practical solutions and improvements.
Learning from Everyday Work
Hollnagel (2014) emphasises the value of learning from everyday work practices. Instead of focusing solely on what goes wrong, organisations should also study what goes right to understand how safety is maintained in daily operations.
Building Resilience
Woods (2015) discusses the need for building organisational resilience. This involves creating systems that are flexible and capable of adapting to changing conditions, thereby improving the ability to handle unexpected challenges.
Conclusion
The shift from conventional health and safety management to Safety Differently represents a significant paradigm change in how organisations approach occupational safety. By moving away from a compliance-centric, control-based model to one that values worker engagement, learning, and resilience, organisations can create safer, more adaptive, and more collaborative work environments. Embracing this new approach not only enhances safety outcomes but also fosters a positive organisational culture that benefits all stakeholders.
By understanding and implementing the principles of Safety Differently, organisations can create a safer, more resilient workplace that not only meets regulatory requirements but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement and employee engagement.
References
Borys, D. (2014). The role of compliance in safety management. *Safety Science*, 70, 123-131.
Dekker, S. (2014). *Safety Differently: Human Factors for a New Era*. CRC Press.
Dekker, S. (2019). The power of engagement in safety. *Journal of Safety Research*, 68, 89-95.
Hollnagel, E. (2014). *Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management*. Ashgate Publishing.
Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. *Reliability Engineering & System Safety*, 141, 5-9.